It’s Not Invasive in MY Garden…What’s the Harm?

The Concepts and Controversies of Introduced Species.

Cathy Kavassalis – Halton Master Gardener

Burning Bush invades a forest understory such as those in High Park, Toronto,ON – (Photo

It is the policy of Master Gardeners of Ontario to encourage the removal of invasive species and to suggest planting alternatives for known invasive horticultural species. While few dispute the need to remove plants like dog-strangling vine, common buckthorn, phragmites or garlic mustard, some balk at suggestions that horticultural favourites like Norway maple (Acer platanoides), Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) Burning Bush (Euonymous altatus), Periwinkle (Vinca Minor), Lily of the Valley (Convallaria majalis), Scilla (Scilla siberica), Miscanthus (Miscanthus sinensis) or English ivy (Hedera helix) should be removed and or discouraged. (See CVC Priority Invasive Plant Lists)

We need to talk about this and grow together in our understanding.

First the basics. What is an invasive plant?

There are various definitions, but at its most basic, an invasive plant is an alien species whose introduction does or is likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human health. Not all introduced species are harmful. The majority of Ontario’s food crops are alien species. Many horticultural plants do not show up on any invasive species list, but a surprising 40% of exotic plant species in Canada are classified as weedy or invasive.

According to our Canadian Food Inspection Agency, “There are approximately 3,858 native vascular plant species in Canada. … In addition, there are 1,229 alien vascular plant species reported at present in one or more locations in the country, adding up to roughly one-quarter of the national flora. Of these alien vascular plant species, 486 are considered weedy or invasive. … Another 316 species are recorded as being native to some part of Canada but introduced into other parts and, of these, 69 are considered invasive. A few of these are regionally considered significant invaders, such as common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) in Quebec, and Manitoba maple (Acer negundo) in Alberta and British Columbia,” (2008. Invasive Alien Plants in Canada: Technical Report. CFIA. Ottawa, ON)

Are they really a problem? Won’t the world’s plants just homogenize anyway?

There are many who suggest that plants move around on their own, so what’s the problem if we assist? We are simply choosing the winners and losers in the game of life, right? But one impact of our movement of plants is becoming apparent.

Japanese barberry (Berberis thunbergii) is now listed on the list of invasive species in Ontario. Note: it reverts to the species when it regrows from seed. Image:

Researchers around the globe are recording marked declines in native species. In a recent report from the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) scientists noted that species are declining globally at rates unprecedented in human history. “The numbers of invasive alien species per country have risen by about 70% since 1970, across the 21 countries with detailed records…. Ecosystems, species, wild populations, local varieties and breeds of domesticated plants and animals are shrinking, deteriorating or vanishing. …This loss is a direct result of human activity and constitutes a direct threat to human well-being in all regions of the world. (2019, “Nature’s dangerous decline ‘unprecedented,’ species extinction rates ‘accelerating’.” United Nations IPBES.) There are multiple causes of this decline: “(1) changes in land and sea use; (2) direct exploitation of organisms; (3) climate change; (4) pollution and (5) invasive alien species.”

The bottom line is that no one really knows the long term impact of species redistributions, reductions and extinctions. We can look back over the course of geological time and see that mass extinctions have occurred and life continued. But will people become “dinosaurs”? A more philosophical/ethical question, do we have the right to displace and or eradicate so many other species with which we share this planet? That is a moral dilemma to ponder.

I like my garden plants and they aren’t a problem in my yard.

The questions that consume ecologists and should concern gardeners: Which plants will be invasive? How do we know if a plant will spread from gardens to ecosystems? How fast does it occur? What are the impacts? How can we control or eradicate them before and after they are categorized as invaders? So many questions.

English Ivy (Hedera helix) from a home garden overtaking a ravine area (Photo: The Carbaro Citizen)

Understanding which species will become successful outside their native range is a fundamental question in ecology. Alien species that establish populations in the wild without human intervention are called ‘naturalized.’ The common orange daylily (Hemerocallis fulva) is a good example of a species that has naturalized across North America. When do these naturalized alien plants cross the line and get called ‘invasive.’ Typically it is when they modify native communities and ecosystems displacing and disrupting native species. We often ignore plants that take advantage of disrupted ecosystems like road verges or barren lands. But when daylilies start showing up in conservation lands, as they have done in Ontario, they are red-flagged as problems. How much of a problem they create depends on many factors.

Invasive species tend to be able to reproduce quickly both by seed and vegetatively and can increase their populations rapidly, to the point of excluding native species. The rate and scale of an invasive species movement is used to categorize them from a policy perspective. Which ones are doing the most harm? Given the limitations in funds, time, materials and labour, ranking species allows people to prioritize control and management activities. All invasive species should be removed, but very simply this can not be done due to resource limitations. Therefore ranking is essential.

Invasive Honeysuckle: Read More HERE (Photos from: Guelph Mercury)

The most noticeable invasive species are those that can grow under a wide range of conditions and are not particular about soil texture, moisture, light or temperature. Others are more restricted by growing conditions, but in the right area will displace natural species and disrupt ecosystems. Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) was introduced as an ornamental plant and for many years seemed well behaved in private gardens. When it made its way into wetlands, however, it became a serious issue. Considerable expense and effort has gone into management of this garden escapee (now kept in check by the release of biological control agents).

In Ontario Parks Hermocalis fulva (Orange Day Lily) is listed as an invasive species

Using day-lilies as an example, there are over 40,000 cultivars. The common orange ditch lily (Hemerocallis fulva) and the yellow daylily (H. lilioasphodelus) are now considered invasive in many areas of North America. This was not the case 20 years ago. But, as gardeners discarded unwanted clumps in natural lands, and seeds travelled from roadside ditches, they have slowly but surely expanded the area of land they occupy. Are all daylily cultivars invasive? No. There are unquestionably sterile clumping forms that have little potential to escape gardens. However, we have few systems in place to screen cultivars and it is not always clear from observation in a garden setting how they will behave in a natural meadow or a wetland or a forest. Philosophers like Ned Hettinger argue: “Even when non-natives aren’t weedy or invasive their presence in new habitats homogenizes by lessening floral and faunal distinctions among regions,” (2019).

This is why we encourage gardeners to select native species and avoid introduced species that have the potential to become aggressive spreaders. We also need to encourage our breeders and the landscape industry to develop criteria, protocols, and risk assessment models to assess the invasiveness potential of all new plant introductions. Anytime a nonnative plant is described as aggressive or a spreader, it should be avoided. It’s just too much to deal with! I love my plants.

It is overwhelming. For those of us who have gardened for years and now manage gardens of largely nonnative species, it is a difficult to know what to do. Many of us would like to continue doing what we have done in the past. It is hard to change. But we can change with each others help. We can find new beautiful combinations that are not invasive and celebrate our native biodiversity.

Multiflora Rose root system Image: Univ. of Wisconsin

How we use our yards and create our gardens matters.

Protected or conservation lands are simply not sufficient to protect native diversity. Consider, Ontario’s “Carolinian zone,” known as ecoregion 7E in southern Ontario. It covers approximately 22,000 km2. Ecoregion 7E occupies less than 0.25% of Canada’s landmass, is home to 25% of the population, yet provides habitat for over 40% of Canada’s plant species. According to the Carolinian Project, “protected areas and conservation lands only comprise 1.5% of the Carolinian zone.” That is simply not enough to secure native biodiversity for future generations.

So what is the harm of one burning bush or one exotic honeysuckle in one yard? Think about thousands of yards with thousands of introduced species across Ontario. Think about how little space we have set aside to protect native species. When our introduced horticultural species press into conservation lands, they reduce the space where native plants can grow and reduce the populations of species that rely on those native plants for food and shelter.

For these reasons we recommend removing invasive species from gardens and advise choosing native species (or non-aggressive non-native species) when creating or adding to gardens.

Where do you begin with invasive species? If you border on natural lands or water systems, begin at the edges to reduce their movement. Start with small sections so you don’t feel overwhelmed and target the most egregious spreaders like:

  • Goutweed, Aegopodium podagraria
  • Manitoba maple, Acer negundo
  • Norway maple, Acer platanoides
  • Garlic mustard, Alliaria petiolata
  • European or black alder, Alnus glutinosa
  • Japanese barberry, Berberis thunbergii
  • Oriental bittersweet, Celastrus orbiculatus
  • Dog-strangling vine, Cynanchum rossicum & C. nigrum
  • Autumn olive, Elaeagnus umbellata
  • European spindletree & winged euonymus, Euonymus europaeus and E. alatus
  • Lesser celandine; fig buttercup, Ficaria verna (syn. Ranunculus ficaria)
  • Reed or giant manna grass, Glyceria maxima
  • English ivy, Hedera helix
  • Giant hogweed, Heracleum mantegazzianum
  • Dames rocket, Hesperis matronalis
  • Himalayan balsam, Impatiens glandulifera
  • Non-native bush honeysuckles, Lonicera spp.
  • Creeping jenny; moneywort, Lysimachia nummularia
  • Purple loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria
  • Japanese knotweed, Polygonum cuspidatum
  • Common reed, Phragmites australis
  • Common & glossy buckthorn, Rhamnus cathartica & R. frangula
  • Multiflora rose, Rosa multiflora
  • Periwinkle, Vinca minor

We can make a real difference, working and learning together.


CVC Priority Invasive Plants

Plants voted as: INVASIVE (though a US list, this list of 31 plants meet high invasive standards).

Head, L., Larson, B., Hobbs, R., Atchison, J., Gill, N., Kull, C., & Rangan, H. (2015). Living with Invasive Plants in the Anthropocene: The Importance of Understanding Practice and Experience. Conservation and Society, 13(3), 311-318. Retrieved May 6, 2020, from

Kapitza, Katharina & Zimmermann, Heike & Martín-López, Berta & von Wehrden, Henrik. (2019). Research on the social perception of invasive species: A systematic literature review. NeoBiota. 43. 47-68. 10.3897/neobiota.43.31619.

Marshall, Nadine & FRIEDEL, M. & Van Klinken, Rieks & Grice, Anthony. (2011). Considering the social dimension of invasive species: The case of buffel grass. Environmental Science & Policy – ENVIRON SCI POLICY. 14. 327-338. 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.10.005.McNeely, J.A. ( ed. ) ( 2001 ) The great reshuffling: human dimensions of invasive alien species . IUCN, Gland , Switzerland and Cambridge.

Shackleton, Ross & Larson, Brendon & Novoa, Ana & Richardson, David & Kull, Christian. (2018). The human and social dimensions of invasion science and management. Journal of Environmental Management. 229. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.041.

Snow, Kathleen. (2006). Working with the Horticulture Industry To Limit Invasive Species Introductions. Conservation in Practice. 3. 33 – 38. 10.1111/j.1526-4629.2002.tb00025.x

Razanajatovo, Mialy & van Kleunen, Mark. (2016). Non-invasive naturalized alien plants were not more pollen limited than invasive aliens and natives in a common garden. Functional Ecology. 30. 10.1111/1365-2435.12633.

Hettinger, Ned. (2019). Understanding and Defending the Preference for Native Species (Draft) for Bernice Bovenkerk and Jozef Keulartz, eds., Animals in Our Midst: The Challenges of Co-existing with Animals in the Anthropocen

Cover Image: Ontario

search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close